I have a procurement case
Create a comparison
Move through the case, two workflows, costs and the result record.
Procurement decision / model 2.3
Compare two procurement approaches that comply with the applicable rules.
Company policies and the Polish Public Procurement Law (PZP), where applicable, set the same boundaries for both alternatives. Compare time and cost, keeping a record of assumptions, results and limitations.
01 / Choose your goal
Compare a purchase or review the calculation method
Start the comparison
I am reviewing the model
Open the research centre
Review the formulas, assumptions, data sources and steps to reproduce the results.
02 / What the result contains
A result that can be checked and reproduced
The record contains the costs of both alternatives, the assumptions used and the factors the model leaves unpriced.
- 01Alternative names and workflow types
- 02Central result
- 03Declared scenario range
- 04Main cost drivers
- 05Assumptions and limitations
03 / Practitioner path
From case to record in four steps
Choose a similar purchase, adjust the activities and enter your costs. Then download the result with its assumptions.
- 01
Case
Choose a starting point and check the shared legal boundary.
- 02
Workflows
Name the alternatives and review two connected maps of work.
- 03
Costs
Enter the essential values and open detail only when it is needed.
- 04
Record
Read the difference, range, drivers and result boundary.
04 / How the comparison works
01
Neutral result
The model permits either direction of difference and assumes no cheaper alternative.
02
User-controlled data
A local draft works only with consent and is never sent to a server.
03
Shared legal boundary
Mandatory periods and rules remain locked on both sides.
Do you have a procurement to compare?
Start from the closest scenario. You can return and revise the assumptions at any point.